1. You are here:
  2. Homepage
  3. Resource library search
  4. Alternative Credit - Fund Structuring
Memo
20 May 2020

Alternative Credit - Fund Structuring

Alternative Credit strategies often hold illiquid assets. To align investor interests with the underlying portfolio and avoid liquidity mismatches in the fund, more restrictive fund liquidity terms are often required. This memo details some of the key considerations for closed-ended and open-ended credit fund structures

The SBAI Alternative Investment Standards require disclosure of key fund structure terms and the handling of situations where normal redemption mechanics might not apply.

This memo reaffirms the standards and guidance included in the Standards which relate to the fund’s structure and commercial terms. It also outlines the advantages, disadvantages and other considerations for closed-ended and open-ended funds when used inr Alternative Credit Strategies.

  • Closed Ended - Investors may give up liquidity but this can negate liquidity mismatches. We also discuss fee structures and the use of subscription lines.
  • Open Ended – Investors have more flexible liquidity but there is increased risk of liquidity mismatches. We also discuss gates, side pockets and fee structures.
Alt Credit - Fund Structuring
Download

Related topics

Credit Governance Fund Structuring Emerging Managers
Return to listing

You may also be interested in

Governance.jpg
26 Jan 2024

GP-Led Secondaries: New SEC Rules Impact on Valuations and Conflicts of Interest

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has introduced new rules to address conflicts of interest when advisers offer investors the choice between selling or exchanging their interests in a private fund for interests in another vehicle managed by the adviser or related parties. In this piece, we explore the impacts of these new rules for investors and managers and highlight considerations for effective implementation.

Memo
Regulatory engagement.jpg
11 Sep 2023

SBAI's Initial Assessment of the SEC's Private Fund Adviser Rules

Our initial assessment of the SEC's Private Fund Adviser Rule[1] is that while there is less prohibition and more disclosure, it remains overly prescriptive. While some controversial aspects in the original proposal have been modified, the rules will bring significant changes to the regulation of Private Fund Advisers that may still fail to address the root of governance failures.

Article